Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 1:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Scientific Calculator was:( Efficiency in Genocide)
>
> > Robert Seeberger wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ronn Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 11:51 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Efficiency in Genocide
> > >
> > > > �Each one has features that the others don't. Which is why I still
> have
> > > my
> > > > HP-16C, also. As well as an old Sharp or Casio financial calculator
> which
> > > > prints out its results on a little tiny roll of paper.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > If you are using Windows XP you can go to the Microsoft Update site and
> they
> > > have a program that turns the windows calculator into a scientific
> > > calculator.
> >
> > Is it any better than the "Scientific" setting of the calculator that
> > comes with various previous Windows OSs? (E.g., Win98, Windows ME)
> >
> I suppose that depends what use you might have for it.
> But its a graphic calculator with quite a few functions.
> The regular calcs that come with windows are much simpler.
Oh, OK. (Not that it's going to make me want to switch to XP, though.)
I can remember the calculator envy I had the first time I saw a graphing
calculator. :)
Julia
