"Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since the gulf is nearly dead anyway, an arcology may not > > be so harmful in the water, and may actually help restore > > some wildlife to the gulf waters. > >
Robert Seeberger wrote: > > Where did you get the idea that the gulf was nearly dead? > It appears to be in good shape here.......near a major > source of its pollution. > There've been reports of a mysterious "dead zone" (severe shortage of oxygen in the water) in the Gulf of Mexico that has been growing over the last year or so. Most any fauna that swims into it dies from asphyxiation. -- Matt
