> From: Andrew Crystall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 1 Jul 2002 at 0:23, J. van Baardwijk wrote: > > > At 17:08 30-06-2002 -0500, The Fool wrote: > > > > > > No, the burden of proof on statements like that is ON YOU. If you > > > > want to SPECULATE, because that is what you're doing, on future > > > > technology, then you must prove the viability of these things. > > > > > >So what you are saying is that you can't or won't back up your > > >statements about world population / etcetera in any way with any > > >data, and are calling for massive genocide, along the lines the > > >holocaust. > > > > I do not recall reading that anywhere in Andy's (or anyone else's) > > posts. > > Quite. What I ACTUALLY said was that I'd not like to see the > sustained world population go much more than 50% above it's current > level. Lower would be nice, but is highly unlikely. > > > > > And bringing a lot nearer the day I unsubscribe from Brin-L for > > > > good, because the list is pushing that way. > > > > > >And sounding just like that Kirsten person just before she went. > > > > Quit it, guys. If you want to discuss this topic like civilised > > adults, then you are more than welcome to do so on-list. Do not be too > > pushy about precise facts; we are merely exploring an idea here, not > > drawing up the fully-detailed and scientifically-100%-sound plans for > > the actual project. > > I'm sorry, I'm supposed to be civil with that piece of shit? No. If > you don't like my tone to him, your recourse is to ban me, nothing > under that will have ANY affect on what I call him. > > > But please please please keep it civilised. If you feel a need to > > resort to namecalling and dirt-throwing, take it off-list. Brin-L has > > seen enough misery in the last few years. > > Yes, and I remember WHY. Let's keep the Israel flamewar in mind here. > I bowed out of ther list for months because of that. > > > Thank you for your help in keeping this list a nice place to be. > > Time to unsubscribe then I guess. As I said, I've become > progressively more dissatisfied with Bein-L since the INCIDENT. Some > of you even know what I mean by that. > > Oh, and we should never have let HIM on here in the first place. You > see him not giving his name as a curiosity, I see it as a threat to > the list. And I think given his behavoir while he's been on the list > that that has been FULLY justified.
pppp l oooo n n k k p p l o o nn n k k pppp l o o n n n kkk p l o o n n n kkk p l o o n nn k k p llll oooo n n k k
