At 21:59 13-07-2002 +0200, I wrote: >I swear, if I do not see all that in your next post, I will once again go >through the posts in this thread, put all your claims and my questions >together in one post, and send that post over and over again, at least >once every 24 hours, till you have learned to behave like a civilised >human being and provide the evidence and answers. Every time I see a post >from you on this list, I will reply to it and remind you that you still >have to provide evidence and answers.
Let it not be said that I do not keep my word... CLAIM #1: >get some professional psychiatric help. With this statement, Erik implies I have mental problems. QUESTION #1: >why would someone be a jerk for complaining when someone puts words in his >mouth? QUESTION #2: >Let's say someone would post the following "chat transcript" to make you >look bad: > >someone : Hey, received those Asian-blowjob pics I sent you? >e.reuter: Yeah, thanks. I really enjoyed them. >someone : Anything else you want? >e.reuter: Got more of those hardcore teenage anal sex pics? >someone : How many do you want? >e.reuter: Couple of dozen. Ain't got many of those on my site yet. >someone : Oh yeah, your site. What's the URL again? >e.reuter: www.erikreuter.net/hardcorexxx >someone : Hold on, I'll go check... >someone : Cool site! Hadn't noticed that kiddieporn section yet. >e.reuter: Big hit. Got about 75 paying customers already. >someone : The money must be pooring in. >e.reuter: At 20 bucks per customer per month, yeah. > >Considering that this might resurface in the future at a most incovenient >moment (say, when you are running for Governor), would you consider >yourself a jerk for complaining about this fake transcript? QUESTION #3: >>You're not the one whose behavior indicates mental problems? What kind >>of problems does your behavior indicate? > >You tell me. You are the only one here who seems to believe my behaviour >indicates problems (mental or otherwise). Erik did not tell me what mental problems I allegedly have, but replied by posting something he claimed to be a psycho-analysis of an other poster, American Patriot (AmPat), but in reality it could only have been a "psycho-analysis" of me (and an insulting one at that). As he denies that, he has technically still not answered the question. QUESTION #4: >AmPat never threatened anyone nor attempted to impose his own will upon >others. For the record, these are all the replies he sent: > >>Hey, why is you badmouthin' mr. Bush? He's the best damned president this >>country has ever seen. He'll show the world that you ain't gonna mess >>with us and get away with it! > >>We oughta have killed them all back in Afganastan. Had saved us a awful >>lot o� trouble. > >>If ya dont like it, ya can always quit the job. Dozens of folks willing >>to take yuor place for less pay. > >>Bloody kiddie-killers. We shoulda wipe�m all out. > >Now, tell me, in which of these four replies does AmPat threaten a listmember? QUESTION #5: >In which of these four replies does AmPat try to impose his own will upon >other listmembers? CLAIM #2: > > There is an awful lot of data about AmPat you are missing; > >What data am I missing? The way to prove me wrong would be to supply >that data. I contend I have enough data and that the analysis of >AmericanPatriot is right on. CLAIM #3: > > AmPat never threatened anyone nor attempted to impose his own will > > upon others. For the record, these are all the replies he sent: > >Nope, you didn't see any private emails that AmericanPatriot sent to >me. You lack sufficient data to make that statement. CLAIM #4: > > Nothing in AmPat's posts gives any indication of that. > >Oh, but you are not looking closely enough! I saw it clearly! QUESTION #6: >>What data am I missing? The way to prove me wrong would be to supply >>that data. I contend I have enough data and that the analysis of >>AmericanPatriot is right on. > >Then present *all* the data and tell us for each data point to which part >of your "analysis" it points. QUESTION #7: >>Nope, you didn't see any private emails that AmericanPatriot sent to >>me. You lack sufficient data to make that statement. > >Again, post all the data, including those private e-mails. QUESTION #8: >>Oh, but you are not looking closely enough! I saw it clearly! Maybe you >>need to improve your skills? > >Then prove me wrong by making a very detailed analysis of his posts. CLAIM #5: > > AmPat is not around, so he will not object. > >Oh, AmericanPatriot is around, all right. QUESTION #9: >Do you think it is ethical to post an amateur psycho-analysis of someone >(AmPat, according to you) without that person's permission? Especially >when that person is still subscribed to this list (subscribed according to >you, that is)? QUESTION #10: >>Oh, AmericanPatriot is around, all right. > >He his? Under what name and e-mail address then? QUESTION #11: >>AmericanPatriot is subscribed to the list under more than one alias. > >Under which aliases is he subscribed then? QUESTION #12: >>And of course AmericanPatriot can always read Brin-L on the www. > >True, he can do that, but can you prove that he actually does do that? >(And if the answer to that question is "yes", then provide that proof.) QUESTION #13: >> > 3) You state that AmPat issued threats in his posts, and that he tried >> > to impose his will upon others. >> >>Fantasy. I did not say "in his posts". > >If not in his posts, then where and when *did* he issue threats and/or try >to impose his will upon others? Post the data. QUESTION #14: >>I have an excellent memory for that sort of thing. It is likely >>I could quote AmericanPatriot emails to me word for word (although >>spelling is another matter). > >Then again, do so. QUESTION #15: >>That's hilarious! > >What is hilarious? Your pathetic practice of attacking people who disagree >with you? Your sickening practice of desperately trying to find excuses >for not answering questions? Your disgusting practice of making claims >about people and then refusing to provide proof? Your childish practice of >deliberately misspelling people's names? Or maybe your overall behaviour >that indicates you have the mental capabilities of an eight-year old (and >that is an optimistic estimate)? QUESTION #16: >>That's humongous! > >What is humongous? Besides your ego, that is? QUESTION #17: > > That's hypatious! > >What is hypatious? QUESTION #18: > > And I expect you to do many things, > >Such as...? QUESTION #19: >>I don't think so. > >You "don't think so" about what? QUESTION #20: >>Perhaps there was a point to it. > >A point to what? Provide proof for all the claims, and answers for all the questions. Jeroen _________________________________________________________________________ Wonderful World of Brin-L Website: http://www.Brin-L.com Tom's Photo Gallery: http://tom.vanbaardwijk.com
