I swear, if I do not see all that in your next post, I will once again go through the posts in this thread, put all your claims and my questions together in one post, and send that post over and over again, at least once every 24 hours, till you have learned to behave like a civilised human being and provide the evidence and answers. Every time I see a post from you on this list, I will reply to it and remind you that you still have to provide evidence and answers.
Let it not be said that I do not keep my word... CLAIM #1: get some professional psychiatric help. With this statement, Erik implies I have mental problems. QUESTION #1: why would someone be a jerk for complaining when someone puts words in his mouth? QUESTION #2: Let's say someone would post the following "chat transcript" to make you look bad: someone : Hey, received those Asian-blowjob pics I sent you? e.reuter: Yeah, thanks. I really enjoyed them. someone : Anything else you want? e.reuter: Got more of those hardcore teenage anal sex pics? someone : How many do you want? e.reuter: Couple of dozen. Ain't got many of those on my site yet. someone : Oh yeah, your site. What's the URL again? e.reuter: www.erikreuter.net/hardcorexxx someone : Hold on, I'll go check... someone : Cool site! Hadn't noticed that kiddieporn section yet. e.reuter: Big hit. Got about 75 paying customers already. someone : The money must be pooring in. e.reuter: At 20 bucks per customer per month, yeah. Considering that this might resurface in the future at a most incovenient moment (say, when you are running for Governor), would you consider yourself a jerk for complaining about this fake transcript? QUESTION #3: You're not the one whose behavior indicates mental problems? What kind of problems does your behavior indicate? You tell me. You are the only one here who seems to believe my behaviour indicates problems (mental or otherwise). Erik did not tell me what mental problems I allegedly have, but replied by posting something he claimed to be a psycho-analysis of an other poster, American Patriot (AmPat), but in reality it could only have been a "psycho-analysis" of me (and an insulting one at that). As he denies that, he has technically still not answered the question. QUESTION #4: AmPat never threatened anyone nor attempted to impose his own will upon others. For the record, these are all the replies he sent: Hey, why is you badmouthin' mr. Bush? He's the best damned president this country has ever seen. He'll show the world that you ain't gonna mess with us and get away with it! We oughta have killed them all back in Afganastan. Had saved us a awful lot o� trouble. If ya dont like it, ya can always quit the job. Dozens of folks willing to take yuor place for less pay. Bloody kiddie-killers. We shoulda wipe�m all out. Now, tell me, in which of these four replies does AmPat threaten a listmember? QUESTION #5: In which of these four replies does AmPat try to impose his own will upon other listmembers? CLAIM #2: > There is an awful lot of data about AmPat you are missing; What data am I missing? The way to prove me wrong would be to supply that data. I contend I have enough data and that the analysis of AmericanPatriot is right on. CLAIM #3: > AmPat never threatened anyone nor attempted to impose his own will > upon others. For the record, these are all the replies he sent: Nope, you didn't see any private emails that AmericanPatriot sent to me. You lack sufficient data to make that statement. CLAIM #4: > Nothing in AmPat's posts gives any indication of that. Oh, but you are not looking closely enough! I saw it clearly! QUESTION #6: What data am I missing? The way to prove me wrong would be to supply that data. I contend I have enough data and that the analysis of AmericanPatriot is right on. Then present *all* the data and tell us for each data point to which part of your "analysis" it points. QUESTION #7: Nope, you didn't see any private emails that AmericanPatriot sent to me. You lack sufficient data to make that statement. Again, post all the data, including those private e-mails. QUESTION #8: Oh, but you are not looking closely enough! I saw it clearly! Maybe you need to improve your skills? Then prove me wrong by making a very detailed analysis of his posts. CLAIM #5: > AmPat is not around, so he will not object. Oh, AmericanPatriot is around, all right. QUESTION #9: Do you think it is ethical to post an amateur psycho-analysis of someone (AmPat, according to you) without that person's permission? Especially when that person is still subscribed to this list (subscribed according to you, that is)? QUESTION #10: Oh, AmericanPatriot is around, all right. He his? Under what name and e-mail address then? QUESTION #11: AmericanPatriot is subscribed to the list under more than one alias. Under which aliases is he subscribed then? QUESTION #12: And of course AmericanPatriot can always read Brin-L on the www. True, he can do that, but can you prove that he actually does do that? (And if the answer to that question is "yes", then provide that proof.) QUESTION #13: > 3) You state that AmPat issued threats in his posts, and that he tried > to impose his will upon others. Fantasy. I did not say "in his posts". If not in his posts, then where and when *did* he issue threats and/or try to impose his will upon others? Post the data. QUESTION #14: I have an excellent memory for that sort of thing. It is likely I could quote AmericanPatriot emails to me word for word (although spelling is another matter). Then again, do so. QUESTION #15: That's hilarious! What is hilarious? Your pathetic practice of attacking people who disagree with you? Your sickening practice of desperately trying to find excuses for not answering questions? Your disgusting practice of making claims about people and then refusing to provide proof? Your childish practice of deliberately misspelling people's names? Or maybe your overall behaviour that indicates you have the mental capabilities of an eight-year old (and that is an optimistic estimate)? QUESTION #16: That's humongous! What is humongous? Besides your ego, that is? QUESTION #17: > That's hypatious! What is hypatious? QUESTION #18: > And I expect you to do many things, Such as...? QUESTION #19: I don't think so. You "don't think so" about what? QUESTION #20: Perhaps there was a point to it. A point to what? Provide proof for all the claims, and answers for all the questions. Jeroen _________________________________________________________________________ Corrupted-World-of-Brin-L Website: http://www.Brin-L.com Tom's Photo Gallery: http://tom.vanbaardwijk.com
