> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Russell Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Verzonden: maandag 22 juli 2002 9:26 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: L*st addresses (Danged ma*l f*lters)
> >IOW, Eileen is superior to the rest of the list, right? Or, perhaps > >more in accordance with your views, I am inferior to the rest of the > >list so the normal rules (banning only by list consensus) do not apply > >to me. > > > Um - no. I didn't say anything like that. What I said was that because > of her involvement with Cornell, she could be put in a difficult > situation by what you did. I seriously doubt Cornell would hold Eileen responsible for what someone else did. > I made no comparison of you, Eileen, or anyone else on the list. Your post indicated that you believed there was nothing wrong with Eileen stating she would remove me as Listowner, even though she would be violating the principle of "banning only by list consensus". > >Again, I did NOT ABUSE MY POWER! When is that going to make it through > >that thick skull of yours? Now, unsubscribing you (without asking > >the list about it) for being an intolerant asshole, *that* would be > >abuse of power. Although people might argue that it is not abuse of > >power, but applaudable community service... > > > Well, considering this is the first time I've spoken up about all this > IIRC, that seems a bit over the top. I haven't said anything about the > spam, or the vitriol or all the other things that have been going on, > but I think this is different. In my personal opinion, and that is all > that any post I send can ever be; doing something that is generally > considered unethical, and is specifically against Cornell's guidelines, Personal attacks are also against the guidelines, but nobody seemed to care about that when Erik attacked me. > just because your listowner status means you can and none of the other > posters on the subject can, seems like an abuse of power. Never mind. I could repeat a zillion times that I did NOT ABUSE MY LISTOWNER POWERS, and explain a zillion times WHY it was NOT ABUSE OF LISTOWNER POWERS, but I will just be talking to deaf ears. You and others are so intent on kicking me down that you (plural) refuse to accept anything that does not serve your purpose. > Besides, Eileen didn't unsubscribe you (or make veiled threats to do > so), she didn't do anything to diminish your membership of this > community, she didn't moderate your posts, block your posts, or do any > of the things that you have proposed for Mark or Erik. She merely did > what Cornell would expect her to do in the circumstances. Since you are apparently so well aware of the details of Cornell's rules, could you please point me to the specific page on their website where it says that a Listowner must be removed from his position if he posts a subscriber list after someone has asked for it? Jeroen "Brin-L Scapegoat And Doormat" van Baardwijk _________________________________________________________________________ Corrupted-World-of-Brin-L Website: http://www.Brin-L.com Tom's Photo Gallery: http://tom.vanbaardwijk.com
