On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Dan Minette wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 10:57 PM > Subject: Re: Atheism Re: CD's > > > But, religion is not about phenomenon. Religion is no more a phenomenon > > than my awareness is. Again, you just presupposed naturalism, and that > > guaranttes the victory for the athiest. > > This bit came across a bit stronger than I intended. A more nuanced > statement is that this type arguements against religion typically tacitly > assume scientific like proofs are used for everything else that we assume > to be true. The fact that we assume the direct vivid experience of being > conscious, unseen by anyone else, is valid shows, IMHO, that other things > are accepted without emperical proof. > > Dan M.
Thanks. I'm not ignoring you, but I haven't had time to write more than quick jots lately. Marvin Long Austin, Texas There ain't no Devil; there's just God when he's drunk. -- Tom Waits
