----- Original Message ----- From: "Marvin Long, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:08 PM Subject: Re: Atheism Re: CD's
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Dan Minette wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 10:57 PM > > Subject: Re: Atheism Re: CD's > > > > > But, religion is not about phenomenon. Religion is no more a phenomenon > > > than my awareness is. Again, you just presupposed naturalism, and that > > > guaranttes the victory for the athiest. > > > > This bit came across a bit stronger than I intended. A more nuanced > > statement is that this type arguements against religion typically tacitly > > assume scientific like proofs are used for everything else that we assume > > to be true. The fact that we assume the direct vivid experience of being > > conscious, unseen by anyone else, is valid shows, IMHO, that other things > > are accepted without emperical proof. > > > > Dan M. > > Thanks. I'm not ignoring you, but I haven't had time to write more than > quick jots lately. I guessed as much, but I didn't want you down 290 on an ass-whupping mission. Dan M.
