David Hobby wrote:

>
>>Slobodan Milosevic's ethnic cleansing of Kosovo. It backed the butcher of
>>the Balkans to the bitter end. Some still claim that NATO's intervention
>>there was illegal, since it lacked explicit UN endorsement. Yet 19 of the
>>world's strongest democracies were surely right to act where the UN,
>>divided, could not.
>>
>>The case of Iraq is different, admittedly. Saddam Hussein has killed far
>>more of his own people and his neighbours than Mr Milosevic ever did; and
>>he has sent his armies and his rockets well beyond Iraq's borders.
>>
>...
>
>       So let me get this straight.  NATO intervened in the Balkans.
>Hussein is worse than Milosevic.  And yet the US can't find even a 
>couple of European allies to help fight Iraq?  
>       If it is such a great idea, you think Bush could sell it to
>a few other countries!  
>       I agree, waiting for the UN to do anything is hopeless.
>But some international support is needed.
>

Could someone point me in the direction of an article that details how 
Hussein is presently pursuing a policy of genocide similar to that 
pursued by Milosevic?  

Doug


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to