>The stat I have on that doesn't give details, so I assume no, it doesn't
>mean 60% of households of one adult and two children.
>
>Does that make the above stat "irrelevant"? I don't think so. It was
>supposed to be indicative of a situation, nothing more.
>
>Ok, 60% of Americans don't earn enough to count as a living wage *if
>they're
>a single parent with two kids*. But there's a substantial proportion of
>people who (may) have no children but earn approx. half that sum or lesss.
Do you have the numbers on this, or are you just claiming it? And do you
know the costs for families besides the "1 parent 2 kid" structure? I don't
mean to sound antagonistic, I'm merely curious. You seem like you're saying
"Some people have this family structure and most people couldn't support it"
Especially because your ideal family here has one person making money and
three consuming.
-Russell
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
