Jim Sharkey wrote:
>
>> Ok, so you aren't really sick of laws protecting people from
>> themselves, right?
>
> I don't believe I was making that point at all by saying
> there are limits.
>
Those are your words. Should I tell you to get back
and read the files? :-P
> You don't believe that a law that protects a dwarf's
> dignity by making him give up his job is a ridiculous
> example of protecting people from something they don't
> need protecting from?
>
<serious>I don't know</serious>
> Admitting that there are times when the needs of
> society outweigh the needs of the individual does
> not equate with saying there are also times that
> society has its head up its collective ass.
>
So, the problem is just how much or how less should
society interfere in peer-to-peer relationships,
right?
The dwarf case *is* something that should go to the UNO,
because there are dwarfs all over the world.
Alberto Monteiro
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
