Richard Baker wrote: 
>  
> I think that the pseudonymity of the Fool is quite 
> reasonable. After all, he or she has a consistent 
> identity and so a coherent reputation 
> that messages can affect.  
> 
And how can we prevent that someone creates a false 
ID in one of those free e-mail services, and start 
sending messages as if it were a real person? 
Or should we require a phone number and a physical 
address so that someone can get there and check if 
every listmember is real? [which would be interesting, 
if some list member claimed he was living in Iraq or 
Antartica] 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Reply via email to