----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: corporations


> Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> >On
> >
> >
> >This is a GOOD thing. Bandwidth costs money to provide, and is a limited
> >resource. It makes perfect sense to charge based on how much bandwidth
> >is used, that is how a free market works. If you try to suppress the
> >law of supply and demand, you get shortages and outages, much like what
> >happened with power in California.
> >
> >This essay is misguided, and the comparison to the airwaves is false
> >(cables and routers cost money to install and maintain, unlike
> >"airwaves" which could be used in peer-to-peer fashion without any
> >expense by a 3rd party).
> >
> What about cable TV?  They don't charge by how much of a couch potato
> you are.
>
> I'm not trying to be a wise guy, just wondering what the difference is.
>
> Doug

The easy answer is that the signal is broadcast to your house whether you
are watching or not.  A lot of traffic goes on a broadband connection, but
only when used. For a while, they use to charge for more than 1 TV, but the
real reason for that was enhanced revenue, not the need to put in better
connections for the folks with 5 TVs.  Indeed, my broadband internet is
spliced in with the same cable as my cable TVs now.

Dan M.

Dan M.

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to