Dan Minette wrote: > I have no problem with the .sig. However, I didn't respond to Sonja's > first comment that the original protest of Gautam, myself, and others was > just paranoia because I was willing to let things lie and because I allowed > a bit of hyperbola by someone who was subjected to a number of rude emails. > (That of course was wrong.)
Maybe you should have read what I wrote a little more carefully. I was painstakingly precise in creating two totally impartial responses. First to the command of Ron on Jeroen's sig. And second to Adam's respons to my first impartial remark. If you wouldn't have known my affiliation to Jeroen you might have noticed it. > However, after it became a repeated theme for Sonja; I decided to respond. So now I can no longer say how I feel about this whole thing, without everybody tripping over themselves trying to show me the error of my ways no matter what I wrote of how I wrote it? I think that is a bit rash, but what the heck. :o) > I have no problems with Jeroen put in his sig. I have a significant > problem with any credible threat of RL consequences. That is not paranoia. I believe my first mention of paranoia was in relation to what happened in the past before Jeroen changed his web site and as a counterpoint to what I feel Nick has been doing. And I believe the general tone of my responses would warrant a little credit in that respect. But I admit it was unfair of me to drag that old cow back in and I'll retract what I said about people being paranoid in respect to Jeroen's capabillities to wreck havoc on this list. > Indeed, my issue is with Sonja's posts, not Jeroen's sigs. I differ with > them and thus write a rebuttal. It's been noted. I've abstained from partaking in any of the heated exchanges other than factual because I actually expected to be treated unfair and seen as partial. I felt that this would lend my point of view no credibillity whatsoever. I've been proven right in that respect. So in effect it was a waste of effort and time. So as a result I won't express my opinion on this subject again, since it is apperantly not apreciated that I do so, be it in jest or seriously. > No hard feelings. It'll just save me a lot of time, that's all, so no hard feelings. :o) > Indeed, a casual perusal of my posting patterns indicates that I do tend to > write rebuttals for posts I differ with, even when they are written by people > I like. :-) Sonja :o) _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
