At 12:08 AM 1/6/2003 -0500, you wrote:
At 11:22 AM 1/5/2003 -0500 Kevin Tarr wrote: >Yes congratz John. There was no way that should have happened, but that's >the playoffs. The Falcons had solid defense, moved the ball well, and >showed poise. Plus I didn't know Duckett was back.What do you mean that there is no way that should have happened? First, the Falcons are legitimately a very good team - they have a defence that can keep any game close, and one player, Michael Vick who can single-handedly win a close game if it comes down to it. Moreover, Green Bay's defense has been suspect all year - and they were playing without perhaps their best defensive player - Darren Sharper. Additionally, they were also missing Brett Favre's favorite target - Donald Driver, leaving them without any quality wide receivers. So, while I didn't necessarily anticipate Atlanta's domination of Green Bay, its not like it was.... well..... *unpredictable.* :) John D. Giorgis
I know the silliest thing I can do is make a X beats Y, Y beats Z, Z should not beat X type argument but that's what I saw. I know the Packers lost to the Jets but I'd give that game to the Jets, they were so fired up. And the Browns beat the Falcons, same reasons but I also thought the Falcons were finally playing normally, i.e. losing. Maybe Favre does want to sit on a tractor in Mississippi full time, he sure looked more like a farmer than a hall of fame NFL quarterback. I was just surprised by the outcome. I kept waiting for the comeback.
Know anyone with an extra Eagles ticket? I'll wear my PSU hat. It's supposed to be really cold here next weekend.
Heck the Giants, they lost that game; the Niners didn't win it. Tell pretty boy Seahorn that hugs and high fives don't mean anything in the first half.
Kevin T.
work again?
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
