on 9/1/03 9:35 pm, Deborah Harrell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Well, according to my American Heritage Dictionary (no > laughing, you across the pond! ;D ), the first def is > as you said, "to prove false or erroneous," but the > second def is "to deny the accuracy of," which puts it > more on the metaphysical plane - or belief. ;) > > William also said: > In the real world nobody refuted the argument.
I meant that in the first sense of the word. > But I agree with you that articles of pure faith can't be proven or unproven I refute that :) -- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/ If you listen to a UNIX shell, can you hear the C? _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
