William said: > Since there is empirical evidence for consciousness, your argument > fails.
There's only heterophenomenological evidence for consciousness - some people say they experience it. There's exactly the same kind of "evidence" for God. Also, the idea that something doesn't exist if there's no empirical evidence for it is necessarily time-sensitive. For example, by that argument, neutrinos and the planet Pluto didn't exist in the 19th century. I suppose an ontology dependent in that way on epistemology is quite interesting though. Rich GCU Entirely Serious _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
