Marvin said: > Are both sets of heterophenomenological (whew!) evidence/claims equal > w/respect to internal consistency, consequences of acceptance or > denial, and so on?
I don't think they are equally internally consistent, but that's not the real key point. The heterophenomenological isn't for the existence of God, but rather for the existence of the idea or "experience" of there being a God. I think that's a worthwhile thing to study, just as the "alien abduction" experience is worthy of study. But it doesn't mean that God or little grey aliens or qualia exist in the same way that neural states exist. Rich GCU I Had A Point But I Seem To Have Misplaced It _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
