> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On > Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Desktop Icon Utility
>
> Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm not making any sort of connection or implication between what 
> > policies the Bush Administration is following and those of Nazi 
> > Germany.  I did not say or imply that with that quote.  Please don't

> > put words in my mouth. I merely posted a quotation that I found 
> > interesting as a sig line.
>
>
> OK, but what did you find interesting about it?  

Well, I think Goering himself a fascinatingly evil political figure.
The man arguably was more of a demon than Hitler (he, not the Fuhrer,
was the one who ordered Heydrich to 'carry out preparations with regard
to the Jewish question').  The man combined charisma, vanity and ego
with a shrewd political sense and was a war hero who the German people
practically worshipped.  

Goering was the man who, along with his leader, was able to smoothly
convince his countrymen to torture and murder millions of fellow human
beings.  A glance into the way his mind functioned interests me,
especially when it comes to how he thought the mass mind worked.  I'm a
strong believer that you should learn the way your enemies think in
order to know how to counter them.  If ever there was a man that could
destroy civilization and do it effectively it was Goering. 

I'll go into why Nazi tactics were different from the current Bush
administration's policies at the end of this post. 

> It's the kind of thing that can be very easily interpreted the way 
> Jeroen did.  

Yes, but it's *his* interpretation.  Not mine.  This should be a
surprise to no one.  He's been quite vocally anti-american for years
now. 

If Jeroen wanted to point out similarities between my posted quote and
current US gov't policy it would have been more honest of him to own up
to the connections he himself was making rather than making such
connections and then saying I had done so.  

> Especially after a mid term election wherein many 
> candidates were denounced (and subsequently defeated) "for lack of 
> patriotism and exposing the country to danger."  
>
> Doug
>
> GCU A Rose Is A Rose

I think perhaps the difference between us is that I think that such
denounciations and accusations could be justified and possibly accurate.
In a foxhole, no one is more dangerous than a soldier who refuses to
fight and protect his fellow soldiers. 

In Nazi Germany circa the early 1930's the German government created
fear and loathing of several groups of people by merely accusing them of
treason against the state and worse without evidence.  Those groups had
done nothing to the government or its people before being rounded up and
murdered. 

By contrast, we were physically attacked on September 11th and the proof
was seen by the entire world. 

Now, the primary function of a government is to maintain its borders.
To do this effectively, it must protect its citizens and borders from
external threats.  The second those planes hit the Pentagon and Twin
Towers our entire country was shown that our government had failed us in
its primary duty.  You may argue that it was impossible for them to have
predicted and countered every threat imaginable, and I would agree with
you.  But, how safe and protected did you as an American citizen feel at
3pm on September 11th?  Polls indicate that the vast majority of post
9-11 Americans have no problem with us removing threats to our security
by conventional (non-wmd) methods. A pacifist policy would not eliminate
these very real threats and could very well exacerbate them by making us
appear weak and even more vulnerable. 

So, I honestly think that political figures who ignore the current
global situation could be very well be a threat to their own country.
But then, I live in one of those cities which was targeted and attacked.
Perhaps I just have a different perspective -- living as if you have a
bulls-eye painted on your ass will do that to you.

Despite the lure of positive thinking and pacifistic optimism, I do
believe that our government is going to have to maintain a stronger
vigilance and a more paranoid outlook.  I'm sure as hell not happy with
some of the IMO rather drastic lengths I see this administration going
to, but they're not wrong to do try and prevent another 9/11.  The
situation isn't black and white... and we have several thousand dead to
prove it. 

Jon
Of course that's just my opinion... I could be wrong.  And considering
that I'm running on 4.5 hours of sleep in 32 hours I definitely could be
wrong! :)

Anyway, I'm Sure This Will Prompt Some Arguments Maru
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to