Dan Minette wrote: 
> 
>> Uh? Does it mean that someone could be taken to a 
>> court by claiming that Pi = 4? 
>  
> No, they just have a very unusual float to integer 
> transform, which rounds up instead of truncates. :-) 
>  
>> Or by denying Evolution? 
>  
> But evolution isn't a fact its a theory. 
>  
> A theory that is very well supported by the facts, 
> mind you, but still a theory. :-)  Its no more a 
> fact than QED. 
> 
So is Holocaust - after all, we all might have been 
created this Thursday, with implanted memories. 
  
>  I think that, properly taught, a semester long 
> discussion of creationism "science" vs. evolution 
> and cosmology would be a very good way of teaching 
> the nature of science. 
>  
Why the Pseudo-Christian Creation Myth? I'd rather 
watch a discussion of the Tupi Creation Myth. 
 
BTW [as I mentioned en passant yesterday in the 
Chat Room] some days ago I watched a Priest 
[Padre Quevedo] say something about Christian 
Science. In resume, he said that it ain't. 
Something like: 
 
  When Jesus answers that he doesn't know when 
  will be the end of the world [I don't know 
  the exact quote...], he is just saying that 
  _Religion should never bother about this 
  question, because this belongs to Science_, 
  thus separating Religion and Science. The argument 
  is that, since Jesus was God and God is omniscient, 
  he _knew_ when would be the end of the world, 
  but he was explicitly avoid answering that question 
  because it's not a religious question. 
 
Alberto Monteiro 
 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Reply via email to