> From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I just don't think that it makes sense to have two types of > resolution. I > mean, what's the point of making a resolution if you can't > enforce it? It's > just a waste of time and money then; such a system turns the > UN into a paper tiger. I think that's sort of the point. Why make resolutions that *do* have the threat of enforcement (which 1441 did) but not bother to enforce it? - jmh _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
