> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:28:19AM +0100, William T Goodall wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 11:44 pm, Erik Reuter wrote: > > > > > >Good point, very true. Of course, one could also wear false > > >fingerprints. The problem of quickly and accurately identifying people > > >is a difficult one, and one that likely won't be solved soon. > > > > They could use those chips they put in pets... with a bit of crypto-key > > stuff and whatever since the pet ones aren't designed to be secure... > > How do you get people to consent to have chip implants? And if they > don't consent, how do you keep them from removing them?
You put the chips in their clothes, their money, their tires, their keys, their food packaging, their car parts, their phones, and you make it so these chips can't be removed or disabled without destroying the product they purchased. 2005 is the year mandated for the Euro to have imbedded RFID chips in all new Euros. Cell phones and some new cars have mandatory GPS responders. All new tires have RFID chips embedded in them. New cars require keys with RFID chips in them. Clothes stores are putting chips in clothing. Fight the Future. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
