On 29 Sep 2003 at 20:42, Erik Reuter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:28:19AM +0100, William T Goodall wrote: > > > On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 11:44 pm, Erik Reuter wrote: > > > > >Good point, very true. Of course, one could also wear false > > >fingerprints. The problem of quickly and accurately identifying > people > >is a difficult one, and one that likely won't be solved > soon. > > They could use those chips they put in pets... with a bit of > crypto-key > stuff and whatever since the pet ones aren't designed to > be secure... > > How do you get people to consent to have chip implants? And if they > don't consent, how do you keep them from removing them?
Condition of the job. Simple enough. Don't like it...don't work there. Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
