Dan Minette wrote: > >Take Antarctica, for example. 90+ years after humans first reached the >South Pole, it is still minimally inhabited. It is a vast continent, >supporting life; but it still has very little commercial value. Further, >there is no indication that 50 or 100 years from now, humans will have a >massive South Pole presence. > Maybe a better parallel was the explorarion of the _Seas_. 20,000 years after Man started sailing the seas, and there's still a ridiculously small number of people that live there.
Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
