----- Original Message ----- From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 8:34 PM Subject: Re: Scouted: Cocoa Has More Antioxidants Than Red Wine, Tea
> > > On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 7:24 PM > > Subject: Re: Scouted: Cocoa Has More Antioxidants Than Red Wine, Tea > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:22:07PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > > > > > You don't taste a distinct difference? > > > > > > You don't read well? > > > > > > > This?.......over the term "different animal"? > > > > You could advance straight to the name calling in your quest to prove your > > superiority. > > But this grasping at straws style of searching for a niche to exploit would > > be tedious if it were not so amusing. > > > > You can even blow up and have a nice little one sided flamewar, because you > > can trust in this, the feeling is not mutual. > > Besides, there's more than just animal involved. In fact, the only sort > of animals involved are a) the one consuming the stuff, and b) the sort > that produces milk to go into the hot cocoa, with whatever amount of > processing between the animal and the mug. There's a very important > *vegetable* involved, why not use the term "different vegetable"? > > :) That's cool with me....I mean its only a figure of speech in any case. xponent Informal Talk Maru rob _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
