On 14 Nov 2003 at 14:30, The Fool wrote: > > From: Jon Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >On 14 Nov 2003, at 6:19 pm, The Fool wrote: > > > > > >>>From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >>>I withdraw my earlier question. You clearly are either drunk or > > >>>on drugs. > > >> > > >>I didn't write this, a christian fantatic wrote it. It show the > > >>way > some > > >>people think they can achieve their fascist theocracy goals. No. > And > > >>No. > > > > > >Maybe you should make more use of "xxx" or 'xxx' or `xxx` and also > > >>xxx > > >and then it would be clearer which bits were written by a fanatic > > >:) > > > > It really would have been nice if he had posted the full intro from > Mark > > Byron, rather than just alluding to it and brushing it aside. But > that > > would have diluted Fool's message, I guess. Sort of funny coming > > from someone who constantly rails against the 'fascist thought > > police' and 'manipulation of the truth'. > > I gave a link to it. This nut goes on to describe a viscious coup > attempt in vivid detail, mapping out which particular people need to > be killed in detail, listing their names. He says specifically that > he thinks about this a lot. Then he says don't do this this would be > bad, wink wink, nod nod.
And you think nutters are any less nutters if they're secular because? There is ALLWAYS an irreduceable number of nutters in any Human society. The linked chap is just one of them. Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
