On Thursday 2003-12-25 05:46, Alberto Monteiro wrote: > I agree with your interpretation of GURPS Uplift. But I still think that > the indenture phase should be _another_ phase. Uplift is considered a > service that the patron does to the client, so this must be followed > by the indenture, that is way of paying back. > > Alberto Monteiro >
Adding a *true* indenture phase would be nice. Then we would have pre-uplift/claim phase minority (uplift proper, uplift stages 1-5 per GURPS Uplift 2nd ed.) indenture (payoff for minority, new request from DB SeJ, et al) maturity. Would you like me to add an extra-cannonical true indenture to any future fan-fic I might write? _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
