Trent Shipley wrote: > > Adding a *true* indenture phase would be nice. > I think this is in agreement with the Canon. I should be hunting for quotes now, but I'm too busy - ah, the good old times when I had a job and _lots_ of time to spend in my hobbies!
> Then we would have > > pre-uplift/claim phase > minority (uplift proper, uplift stages 1-5 per GURPS Uplift 2nd ed.) > indenture (payoff for minority, new request from DB SeJ, et al) > maturity. > That's what I think is the correct sequence of events. > Would you like me to add an extra-cannonical true indenture to > any future fan-fic I might write? > Maybe you can keep things a little bit obscured :-) Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
