>
As promised, my ex-wife replies:
The Texas Miracle or The National Nightmare.?
<snip>
rob
I don't know how much was hers, if it all was. I'm not arguing against anything written. I just want to point out that this has been going on for years under all leadership, as the point seemed to be. I consider the problem to come from 1960s (earlier?) when the DoE was created. The Federal gov should not receive or pay out one penny, it should all be handled on the state level. If the DoE remains, it can monitor individual states, and offer suggestions but not mandates.
The problem is money, not too little but too much. Too much for administrators to sit around doing nothing else but trying to figure how to get more. Too much for teachers and their unions to drool over. Too much to build gilded palaces and sports emporiums.
As the writer said, the tax payers are the ones feeling the brunt. I'm not saying I think I should pay nothing, but there aren't too many areas with so little oversight. Unpaid, nonprofessional busybodies controlling tens of millions of dollars. (And before anyone says I should do something, because of my job I cannot hold an elected position.)
Kevin T. - VRWC Enough for now
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
