On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 02:03:13PM -0500, Jim Sharkey wrote: > However, since those who have responded have been about evenly divided > in their interpretation of my statement, I will concede that despite > my own read of my words, it is possible to interpret it as the > vehement opposition to gay marriage that you seem to have taken it as. > Would you then concede that it is possible that you misinterpreted my > statement as being more fraught with negative meaning than it was?
"Vehement"? Now who is putting words in others mouths? I said you made an implication. Where did I say or imply you are "vehemently" opposed? I had the impression you were opposed, and due to your uncomfortable feeling that you may very well vote against using the word marriage for gay unions. I didn't write or imply that you were vehemently opposed. Yes or no question: would you vote against legislation or amendments which would ban using the word "marriage" to refer to gay unions? -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
