On Tue, 18 May 2004 20:21:11 -0700 (PDT), Gautam Mukunda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know, it's just possible that the fact that > the Iraqis _actually had chemical weapons_ is little > more significant. Or is that not important?
We knew that, Twelve buried shells were discovered earlier. To a similar big play up at the time. We also knew he used them in the Iran-Iraq war. I bet if we really looked we could find some CW shells in one of our reserve armories besides the pentagon known locations. I am wondering if the Sarin gas was still potent. It makes it more likely it is because it was a binary system but CW weapons degrade quickly. It is likely the rebels did not know what they had,. Even if it had worked correctly, it didn't, an open roadside is not where you want to deploy it. Now if I was a rebel with 11 of those... I think I'll keep speculation to myself. #1 on Google for liberal news
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
