On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:16:27PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:03 PM
> Subject: Re: thinking about free will
> 
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:46:49PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 8:35 PM
> > > Subject: Re: thinking about free will
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:07:55PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 5:13 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: thinking about free will
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 04:47:32PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Free will, pretty well be definition, means that it is possible
> to
> > > > > > > make
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Except you don't have a useful definition of free will, as you
> well
> > > > > > know.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have the same definition as Kant. :-)
> > > >
> > > > Mindless appeal to a perceived higher authority. Typical :-)
> > >
> > > Actually, not.  The claim you made was extraordinarily strong.
> 
> 
> > Actually, not. And you seem to have missed something.
> 
> You have a special meaning for the word useful? 

Nope. Still missing something.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to