On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:46:49PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 8:35 PM > Subject: Re: thinking about free will > > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:07:55PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 5:13 PM > > > Subject: Re: thinking about free will > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 04:47:32PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > > > > > > > > > Free will, pretty well be definition, means that it is possible to > > > > > make > > > > > > > > Except you don't have a useful definition of free will, as you well > > > > know. > > > > > > I have the same definition as Kant. :-) > > > > Mindless appeal to a perceived higher authority. Typical :-) > > Actually, not. The claim you made was extraordinarily strong.
Actually, not. And you seem to have missed something. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
