----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: John Edwards: John Kerry is Jesus
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 10:16 AM > Subject: Re: John Edwards: John Kerry is Jesus > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 10:27 PM > > Subject: Re: John Edwards: John Kerry is Jesus > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 10:06 PM > > > Subject: Re: John Edwards: John Kerry is Jesus > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sheesh.....that article is cheesy in its use of misdirection. I > > have > > > > no doubt that one can find partisan doctors who are afflicted with > > > > this or that, but I tend to read science articles as having more > > > > creedence. > > > > > > We have a neurologist on staff, if you will, on brin-l....Zimmy > > Would he > > > be a reasonable person to give a good answer on what the general > > consensus > > > of the medical community is? > > > > > Well sure Dann!, I'm more than willing to entertain the views of > > anyone on the list. > > But what I am reading here ATM is a bit contrary to what I have read > > in the news otherwise. Medical researchers may be overstating the > > potential of stem cells, but I have not seen Kerry or Edwards make > > claims as far reaching as ones researchers themselves have made. > > (Frex: growing new limbs) > > > > Bob, may well have pertinent insight on neurological applications from > > stemcell research. And I would be glad to hear it. But this research > > has implications that range quite a bit farther than just neurology. > > Sure, but he would be able to provide much better perspective, I think, > than a Scientific American article on the subject. I read things on > physics in the news and there can be a systematic bias in the news stories > towards a particular slant. The slant is usually what would make the story > sound a bit more interesting to the casual observer. > > We have two questions that have been raised by the Democrats: nerve cell > regeneration and Alzheimer's prevention/reversal. Both are tied in with > neurology. My mom had a neurosurgeon, for example, perform her back > operation and her roommate at the hospital was a stroke victim. There may > be other issues, that's true, but the two that have been raised fit very > well into Zimmy's expertise. > Well, that's certainly true. Even organ replacement would have some degree of neurology involved. xponent The Nerve! Maru rob _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
