On Dec 24, 2004, at 3:08 PM, JDG wrote:
At 03:57 PM 12/24/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:I can only see it as strategic to Iraq if their purpose was to pull
the
West into the region in order to touch off a larger conflict. If it
was
to actually try to expand their borders, they were nuts, a possibility
that cannot be discounted!
Nuts?
If your man, John Kerry, had been President, the US wouldn't have even
attempted to stop him.
That's pure conjecture and you know it.
Not really. It is only based on the assumption that John Kerry votes on
principal.
Just in case Dan didn't spell it out....
John Kerry, after all, voted against that war.
Kerry didn't have enough principle to clearly vote against *or* for the war. That was one of the things Duh-bya harped on: "Flip-flop! Flip-flop!"
Interesting that amid all the noise about who knows history and who doesn't, we're seeing the history of the last three months so clearly being edited, redacted and entirely manufactured in the minds of so many alleged conservatives.
-- Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books http://books.nightwares.com/ Current work in progress "The Seven-Year Mirror" http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
