> I can see one problem: the regular chatters are Mac or Linux > users, and I imagine that the holochat software is > Windoze-based. We may be killing the old chat and _not_ > creating a new one. > Alberto Monteiro
Maybe. I must admit that as much as I like chatting with all of you, I get frustrated with the MUD interface and have trouble following conversations. I guess that I am lazy and am used to the more "standard" instant message interface. Maybe there is a more intuitive interface available for MUD? Honestly, I would participate more if I used a different interface. I was just reading over the Holocene website again looking for a few things. Will this require client software or it is strictly a web based interface? I just glanced over the site, so I probably missed it. For one of the options, the term "Meetingware" implies an actual software client. Just curious. Even if it does require client software, I can't imagine that they won't create a Mac compatible version, if they haven't already. I assume that we have been using MUD because of compatibility between different O/S's and browsers? Is anyone here still using a text based browser? Before anyone gets defensive or offended, I am genuinely curious - not being critical :-) Gary _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
