On 5/11/05, Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 11:19 PM Tuesday 5/10/2005, Warren Ockrassa wrote: > >On May 10, 2005, at 7:33 PM, Dave Land wrote: > <snip> > >Oh, "history" will tell -- big f*cking deal. How does the interpretation > >of someone living 100 years form now matter to the pricks responsible for > >this disaster *today*? > > > >Nothing -- absolutely nothing -- about Iraq is right. > > How much was right about it before GW2? Is the "average" Iraqi better off > or worse off now than then? Or, for another measure, is the number of > Iraqi people who are better off without SH in charge greater than the > number who were better off with him and his sons and cronies in charge? > > (These are not rhetorical questions. I am asking for a serious "before" > and "after" comparison between the common people's lives and their > potential futures.) > > > -- Ronn! :) > JDG will complain that the measures we use to explain that the average Iraqis are worse off are not valid.
Just like he will complain we are using the wrong measures and not looking at the big picture when studies show that the Iraq war has increased terrorism around the world and made Americans less safe. His big argument will be we have not had another 9/11. He will not connect that there have been no instances of a terror attack on the US being intercepted as there were in the Clinton administration. Do the terrorists feel that giving us Bush is punishment enough or that W is their best recruitment tool? -- Gary Denton Easter Lemming Blogs http://elemming.blogspot.com http://elemming2.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
