----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <brin-l@mccmedia.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 10:31 PM Subject: Re: meta research
> Dan wrote: > > > The freezing of the vacuum. > > Freezing nothing turns into something, or did the vaccum have something in > it? If so, what, and where did it come from? Symmetry breaking dropped the vacuum to a lower energy state. > No, I'll take your word for it. So matter can only be created when a > vacuum full of plasma freezes? Energy was not created....it was just a state change. > > > >> > The second is when we heard the echos of the big bang, right at the > >> > energy it was supposed to be at. As you see, the website doesn't > >> > attempt to > >> > discuss this. > > > 1) interested > > I was pointing out that they did have something to say about it and also > that, acording to them, CBR was predicted to be between 5 and 50 K with 50 > K being the most recent guess prior to it's discovery. So that if they > are correct (you tell me) then it wasn't "right where it was supposed to > be." Gammov said under 10 Kev...when the Bell Laboratory researches who found the COMB (cosmic microwave background) saw that, they then knew what they found. Now, with a bit more work on expansion after the time the universe became transparent, the numbers fit closely. There are other problems with the meta explanations. Scattering doesn't produce a red shift...it produces a broadened lower energy spectrum....like the COMB spectrum, for example. :-) What is seen is not a general broadening, but shifted emission lines. In fact, that kind of downshifting is what I cut my professional teeth on in gamma-gamma logging, so I'm embarrassed it took me a bit to put my finger on what was wrong there. Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
