> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Charlie Bell > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 3:57 PM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: Re: Myers-Briggs > > > On 07/05/2006, at 11:53 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: > > > > > I think "militant atheism" is a better description of the > > philosophy apparently espoused by The Fool. > > Certainly is. > > > > > There is no text from which to be "fundamentalist" for atheism, as > > far as I know. "Militant" is a reasonably accurate adjective to > > denote the passion with which this philosophy appears to be held. > > Precisely. > > > If anyone is going to be militant regarding religious attitude, I > > would prefer to engage in debate with a militant agnostic above all > > other militants, personally. ("I don't know and you don't > > either!" "You're right, I don't know. Let's go have some lemonade > > together, OK? Unless you're allergic to citrus or something.") > > *chuckle* > > Of course it's possible to be both agnostic and atheist - to accept > that it's impossible to prove or disprove the existence of a deity, > while believing that there isn't one.
Well, then it's clearly possible to be an agnostic Christian by that definition. A significant fraction of Christians would be agnostics, by your definition...including me. Even our pastor, who is fairly Evangelical, agrees that there is no proof of the existence of God. Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
