Nick Arnett wrote:
On 5/7/06, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So? Non-belief in the supernatural can't be "fundamentalist",
there's no scripture or dogma. I
Eh? Insistence on the non-existence of God *is* dogma. Any
insistence on the non-existence of something is dogma. It has to be,
since it cannot be logically proved.
There's no scripture, though, which I think is an important part of the
definition of "fundamentalism".
I think "militant" is a more useful adjective when describing some
atheists. See my previous post on the subject.
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
