> I'm perfectly happy to discuss "my view", or whatever, further, if > you think it would help. Although, to be honest, I think your view, > Dan, and mine are close enough on all the details we've actually > thought about and discussed that I'd be perfectly happy for you to > substitute your own for mine.
Thank you. What I was thinking of was your view that there was a good question to be asked about the WT7 collapse, but that Dave's wording didn't present it. I was sorta fishing for you to present what you thought was a good question when I mentioned your name. :-) I have a hunch I'm going to edit the question(s) about WT1 and WT2, so I was hoping that you could provide a template for that question. Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
