On 9/13/06, Gibson Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Dan, I guess I missed that message in the bustle of my life. As another after word, every single one of my Archt schoolmates contacted in no way buys the official story. Every one of them cited the pile-up of those vertical support beams should have tipped the building, any building, off to one side or another. None could think of examples of a zero footprint implosion w/o demolition. Confusion over the complete sell-off of all material that could be studied was a mystery that baffles many
The same sort of thing baffled me after the fire that destroyed the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. How can anyone conduct an arson investigation to see who started the fire if the mess is cleaned up before the ashes are even warm? Isn't that called destroying evidence or something like that? I thought destroying evidence was illegal? And doesn't it seem like that is what happened after the WTC towers came down on 9-11? Why the big hurry to clear up the mess before an investigation can be conducted to see exactly what happened? Look how long they tape off a crash site for a downed airliner so they can figure out what happened. But the way the news came out on 9-11, it seemed they knew exactly what happened even before the dust had settled. They even knew Osama bin Laden did it before the day was out. Amazing! John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] *********************************************************** Do you play World of Warcraft? Let me know. Maybe we can play together. *********************************************************** All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
