--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm curious about this wink. Are you not fully on-board with the > doctrine of the assumption? It's not terribly important to me either > way, though I am inclined to think that it is a Churchly creation > intended to exalt Mary, rather than a historical fact.
Not at all. The Assumption is interesting because it is a "two-fer." If you disagree with this dogma, then by definition, you also have to disagree with the dogma of papal infallability. In this case though, I fully believe the teaching. JDG _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
