On 25 Oct 2006 at 23:02, pencimen wrote: > Andrew Crystall wrote: > > > Indeed... > > > > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120268,00.html > > One shell constitutes an active program???
> > http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1163896/posts > > Looks like a right wing loony site. Can you find the same story > from a reputable source? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3861197.stm (Yes, that particular stash had decayed...but only becuas the storage conditions hadn't been controlled...) > Like this one: > > http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/Iraq3Chap2.pdf > > N - There is no evidence of any active Iraqi > nuclear program. > > B-U.S. search teams have not uncovered any > biological weapons or weaponized agents. > > C-No chemical weapons or programs found. They're lying. Period. Iraq had Saran, at the VERY least. They're *STILL* finding dangerous Saran shells (and I wish like heck that some of the so-called news reporters wouls say something about it..I talk to friends of American soliders out there for the real news, tbh). AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
