On 26 Oct 2006 at 14:09, Nick Arnett wrote: > I haven't denied that. I've just refused to leap to the conclusion that > A couple of leftover warheads with sarin hardly constitutes a stockpile,
Lies. PLAIN LIES. You ARE denying it, and "leftover" warheads, right. Over FIVE HUNDRED leftover warheads, right. > especially since Iraq launched lots of them against the Kurds, many of which > undoubtedly were duds and are sitting around in the desert until somebody > finds them and (a) disposes of them or (b) tries to use them against their > enemies. No. You don't GET "duds" with binary Sarin rounds. The two used for roadside bombs in 2004 were still un-mixed, and very dangerous. Other rounds from the same era, in 2004, would of been the same. Yes, more recently they've found hundreds of similar rounds, mixed and since degraded. Given Iraq's sarin would have a life of no more than three weeks after mixing and the fact the seals between the portions had degraded...that degredation looks relatively (post-invasion) recent. > Leftover duds, as I'm sure you know if you've read the documents about this, > are almost certainly the source of the ones that have been found. No U.S. No, they are almost certainly are NOT. That is pure political spin at odds with rational analysis of the evidence. > Your name-calling doesn't exactly go far to convince me that all those Your blatent lies and historical revisionism.. well, when do we get to the holocaust denial? Because THAT is another logical progression, from the little popular historical re-writings to the major ones, as paranoia progresses. Seen it all before, in formerly rational people. And by the way, there seems to be a lack of response to list commands on the website. In about an hour I'll just go ahead and blacklist it anyway. AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
