On 27 Oct 2006 at 8:52, Charlie Bell wrote: > > On 27/10/2006, at 7:17 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote: > > > > >> Your name-calling doesn't exactly go far to convince me that all > >> those > > > > Your blatent lies and historical revisionism.. well, when do we get > > to the holocaust denial? Because THAT is another logical progression, > > from the little popular historical re-writings to the major ones, as > > paranoia progresses. Seen it all before, in formerly rational people. > > Andrew, calm down. Equating doubt about your unconventional claims
Charlie, piss off. > about the level of Saddam's weapons stockpile with holocaust denial > is just disgraceful. It's not on at all. No, it's RIGHT up there. Denial of rational facts because of a belief bias which prevents you from listening to the evidence. Same goat, same goat. (If you want a *real* flamestorm, I recently stated on a MMO forum that there was no difference between the rights of the RIAA to restrict digital music distribution and the rights of MMO makers to restrict real-money trade of their in-game currency and goods). > There aren't any denialists here, just people who doubt evidence that > you keep claiming but haven't provided clear evidence for. You keep Again, read the links. People talking rubbish about the rounds, when the rounds were BINARY, and rounds from the same era had seals which were, verifyably from the roadside incidents, still intact as late as early 2004. > saying it's there, you desperately want to believe it, but you > haven't shown the evidence that'll convince many of the critical > thinkers here. Critical? You're mush-heads who can't believe simply FACTS when they're put before you, trying desperately to YOUR belief that Saddam had no NBC weapons and no willingness to use them. AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
