Charlie wrote: > > > I could be wrong, but doesn't the rule have something to do with the > > adverse > > effect of the extreme amount of stress on a young, developing body? > > If the > > rule was arbitrary, why don't they have it for other sports? > > They do. Divers, 14. Fencers, 17. And so on. > > That's kinda what I meant. Its not 16 straight across the board.
Doug poorly stated on my part maru _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
