> > bush deserves most of the blame for the
> massive deregulation after his "re-election".
> What deregulation would that be?
take your pick, williams, or google the names that were in my post (i explained
the correlation between money and idealogy, ethics and morality). you
consciously ignore the substance of my post and ask questions that are
irrelevant, to distract and obfuscate the issue.
yes, both parties waste revenues, but the dems divert them to the poor as
entitlements, and employ a bureacracy of middle class paper pushers.
republicans divert revenues to wealthy arms dealers, stock brokers, financial
managers, loan officers, CEOs, etc. that IS extremely relevant, as to the
motive. they are completely variant avenues to power, one motivated by greed,
the other by genuine desire for positive social change.
> > the left is very different from the right,
> ronn. the big money controlling their discourse
> > represents a completely different idealogy.
> Dollars are more important than idealogy.
> Both Dems and Reps were responsible for
> wasting a lot of my dollars. Their ideologies are
> irrelevant, since they are only a tool used to get
> elected.
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
