2008/5/23 MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > GARY SEVIOUR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Mason no good? (there is/was atleast one member of bristolbathpm using it). > > I remember Mason from years ago. I think the drawback is that it's > mod_perl, which is less common than python CGI.
No it's not. It has a mod_perl handler, you can also use CGI, same goes for all or any of MasonX::MiniMVC, Catalyst, or Maypole. Google App Engine isn't really hosting - you can have any language as long as it's python? Get real. >> Personally I think writing your own framework when you have a job to >> do other than write frameworks is a bad idea. I have worked with an >> "in-house" framework before (in PHP), [...] > > I'd prefer to avoid writing my own, which is why I was looking for a > straightforward framework, preferably in perl where I know the > relevant modules and web host support situation already and shouldn't > get a surprise. Seemed a reasonable question on a pm list... How about the web framework page on the perl5 wiki ? http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?web_frameworks A. -- http://www.aarontrevena.co.uk LAMP System Integration, Development and Hosting _______________________________________________ BristolBathPM mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm
