2008/5/23 Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> you probably haven't even looked at Django, which in some significant
> areas is way ahead of Catalyst.

Care to name a few ?

I couldn't see any when I browsed the website.
* The ORM doesn't offer anything that DBIx::Class doesn't as far as I could see
* The dispatching doesn't work as well as either Maypole or Catalyst
(again as far as I could see)
* The Templating system seems roughly equivilent to Mason ( " " " " "
"), certainly not in the same league as TT (which I believe is being
ported to python)

The scaffold/admin thing looks quite cool, slightly more DWIM than
Catalyst or Maypole, but not "way ahead".

Seriously, I've been working with a few python and php guys who are
looking at which frameworks to use, and have an active interest in
frameworks.

I'm looking forward to starting a 3.x branch of Maypole that drops
some backward compatibility with 2.x and uses the new HTTP::Engine
project to simplify server interaction so I can focus on the really
useful stuff. Any new ideas , particularly ideas that have been tried
and proven in the field in Django or Catalyst deployments would be
really interesting.

Reply offlist if you like.

A.

-- 
http://www.aarontrevena.co.uk
LAMP System Integration, Development and Hosting
_______________________________________________
BristolBathPM mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.bristolbath.org/mailman/listinfo/bristolbathpm

Reply via email to